Hi, On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 1:42 PM Yegappan Lakshmanan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 1:09 PM Prabir Shrestha <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 for adding fuzzy match. >> >> A bit late to this. But few questions. >> >> How do we use matchfuzzy for a list of dictionary instead of item. >> Primary reason for this is LSP (language server protocol) makes heavy use >> of user_data. Can you add an example for sorting a list whose type is dict [ >> { 'word': 'foo', user_data: 1}, { 'word': 'foobar', user_data: 2}, { >> 'word': 'bar', user_data: 3} ]. Should we have a 3rd optional parameter >> that takes a callback? >> >> let completeitems = [ >> \ { 'word': 'foo', user_data: 1}, >> \ { 'word': 'foobar', user_data: 2}, >> \ { 'word': 'bar', user_data: 3} >> \ ] >> let filtertedlist = matchfuzzy(completeitems, 'foo', {item->item['word']}) >> >> > That is a good idea. We can add a callback argument that will be called > for each item > if the list item is dictionary. > You can try the attached diff which implements the above and see how this works with a very large list of dictionaries. - Yegappan > > >> Can we also have this support set completeopt+=matchfuzzy? >> >> >> > -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CAAW7x7nW%3DKuzpvdXOMiyOajKF9smXS%2BERJBL-A6CEiQNKzLWZA%40mail.gmail.com.
fuzzy.diff
Description: Binary data
