Hi Christian, On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 12:06 PM Christian Brabandt < vim-dev-git...@256bit.org> wrote:
> so let me summarize: the current proposal is to remove the public keyword > completely (?) and make all attributes public by default (unless they start > with _)? So by removing this keyword, no-one complains that private > keyword is also missing? > Yes. The only supported keyword for members/methods is "static" for declaring class members and methods. If a member or method name starts with an underscore, then it is private. Otherwise it is public. Regards, Yegappan I like that approach, it makes it easier to spot private members directly > in the code. But I am probably not the one going to use this a lot, so I am > not having any saying here :) > > > -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CAAW7x7mLfPP%3DfMuw2MTiwTo%2B8gRYEfZ86%2BKDGdXwQQB_H%3Dz3Mw%40mail.gmail.com.
