Hi, On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 9:08 AM errael <[email protected]> wrote:
> readonly is working AFAICT. I still need to put together some tests. I > can't try writing to a readonly static because of the compilation failure > bug that prevents writing to class statics. One nice thing about readonly > is that it doesn't affect anything unless you use it. > One of the goals of the Vim9 script is to be similar to other widely scripting languages (like typescript and python) and simple to use. I am not sure whether any other OO language supports the "readonly" keyword. Can we keep it simple and make the methods/members either private or public? > I'm going to put this on the shelf while I put together the PR for > preventing writing to private members. > > The readonly PR is based on this PR. So this PR, #12932 > <https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/12932>, has to go in before I can open a > PR for readonly. Is this PR ready to go? > > > This PR can be merged based on the outcome of these discussions. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CAAW7x7n7PFkcNfCejMYGJiTYk-13MQYMWpRw2LiFCs09CJ6_jQ%40mail.gmail.com.
