Hi Björn,

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:25 AM, björn<[email protected]> wrote:

> That's great!  I think a lot of people will appreciate this.

Thanks! I am happy to hear that.

> I haven't tested the code yet but the patch looks good.  I only have a
> few (trivial) comments at the moment:
> 1. What happens if setNetbeansSocket: is called twice with "socket ==
> -1"?  Same thing if called with two different values for "socket"?  (I
> guess the way it is set up this will never happen but it doesn't hurt
> to be a bit paranoid and make this more robust by freeing all
> structures and setting them to nil before CFSocketCreate...() and
> making sure you don't call CFRelease() twice on the same structure.)

Ok, I have made sure it.

> 2. Check whitespace in feature.h/netbeans.c -- you should use "set et"
> in the core Vim source code files (at the moment there are spaces in
> some places where there should be tabs).
> Sorry, that was meant to read "set noet".

understand. I have fixed about whitespace as other lines.


By the way, we might need to implement `+balloon_eval' as well.
src/gui_beval.c

sakamoto

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_mac" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Attachment: 0001-implemented-netbeans_intg_2.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to