On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 23:10, Dominique Pelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And here are the results below using my Linux x86 laptop > [Intel(R) Core(TM) Duo CPU T2250 @ 1.73GHz]. > > With vim-7.2.26 (huge, GTK2-GNOME GUI): > > real user sys > ------------------------------------- ------ ------ ------ > vim-7.2.26 in xterm ................. 2.312s 0.968s 0.072s > vim-7.2.26 in gnome-terminal ........ 12.469s 0.972s 0.080s > gvim-7.2.26 ......................... 7.715s 5.800s 0.140s > > > With vim-7.1.138 (that comes with Ubuntu-8.04, GTK2-GNOME GUI): > > real user sys > ------------------------------------- ------ ------ ------ > vim-7.1.138 in xterm ................ 2.320s 1.120s 0.088s > vim-7.1.138 in gnome-terminal ....... 15.384s 0.996s 0.056s > gvim-7.1.138 ........................ 26.614s 25.014s 0.376s
Here are my results (Vim 7.2.25, default features, GTK2 support) on my laptop (Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7400 @ 2.16GHz): GVim: gvim -u NONE -U NONE -f -S test-redraw-speed.vim ~/Install/Vim/src/README.txt 9.12s user 0.28s system 2% cpu 6:41.49 total Gnome-terminal: vim -u NONE -U NONE -S test-redraw-speed.vim ~/Install/Vim/src/README.txt 0.75s user 0.06s system 2% cpu 35.531 total Xterm: vim -u NONE -U NONE -S test-redraw-speed.vim ~/Install/Vim/src/README.txt 1.95s user 0.07s system 22% cpu 9.147 total Xterm doesn't use the same font as Gnome-terminal, so I don't think the difference between them is that significant at the end. And yes, it really took 6:41 to run the benchmark with GVim :-) I wasn't doing anything else during the test... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
