On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Dominique Pelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Those are strange results. You have a faster processor (2.16 Ghz > core2 vs 1.73Ghz core2) and yet redraw in gvim is about 52 times > slower than on my laptop (6min 41.49s vs 7.715s)!?
strangeness++; *urxvt with screen*: vim -u NONE -U NONE -S test-redraw-speed.vim 1.80s user 0.10s system 13% cpu *13.995* total urxvt without screen: vim -u NONE -U NONE -S test-redraw-speed.vim 1.80s user 0.11s system 3% cpu 1:03.07 total xterm with screen: vim -u NONE -U NONE -S test-redraw-speed.vim 2.04s user 0.15s system 1% cpu 1:53.05 total xterm without screen: vim -u NONE -U NONE -S test-redraw-speed.vim 2.12s user 0.12s system 2% cpu 1:36.51 total linux console(uvesafb) with screen: vim -u NONE -U NONE -S test-redraw-speed.vim 2.21s user 0.135s system 3% cpu 59.707 total *linux console(uvesafb) without screen*: vim -u NONE -U NONE -S test-redraw-speed.vim 2.15s user *51.62s* system *94%* cpu 56.711 total My vim binary is compiled with +X11. Same fonts and geometry on urxvt and xterm. Processor is a AMD Turion 1.8GHZ (single core). I have a binary compiled without X11 and the results are the same. On every test inside X the X cpu usage go to 90%. My linux distro is Arch Linux with vim 7.2.25. I repeated the test many many times to the same results. Looks like urxvt+screen make a pact to work together... -- «Dans la vie, rien n'est à craindre, tout est à comprendre» Marie Sklodowska Curie. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
