On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
V
>
> On 18/11/08 11:25, Thomas Koch wrote:
> > Am Tuesday 18 November 2008 04:57:07 schrieb StarWing:
> >>> because a firm choice in Vim is to ... (OK, I confess, I'm starting to
> >>> beat a dead horse) ... not have support for interaction with external
> >>> processes.
> >> that's true. i just want a debuger with Vim.....
> > I believe that the issue of external processes interaction is a valid
> > one. It seems so un-unix and bad that VIM implements it's own
> > spellchecker instead of giving me the freedom to use what spellcheck I
> > like.
> >
> > What's the reasoning for not using external processes. Couldn't it just
> > be added as a feature to get everyone happy?
> >
> > Best regards,
>
> AFAIK, every application (Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, but also
> Konqueror, etc.) includes its own spell-checker (if it includes one at
> all, of course). _Dictionaries_, OTOH, are installed as separate files,
> which means that the user's choice applies to them.
Just for the record, mutt can use external spell-checker such as
ispell. However I've never used that, instead spell checking is done
with vim when composing message that can give instant feedback on
typo.
That said, I can see vim 7.2 still flag all chinese characters as
typo.
--
regards,
====================================================
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
唐詩037 王昌齡 塞下曲
飲馬渡秋水 水寒風似刀 平沙日未沒 黯黯見臨洮
昔日長城戰 咸言意氣高 黃塵足今古 白骨亂蓬蒿
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
