Hello, > d) The *one* way to search > - for scripts or libraries > - update them > - distribute them > - customize them > - document them > - evaluate them (not only +1 / 0 / -1, but you should be able to > give feedback easily!) [1] > - reusing code this way > > that thing that vim is lacking but PHP, ruby etc all have (?) > > Does this *one* way exist? I mean vim runs on linux, windows (maybe > cygwin).. so at least there must be some boilerplate code to handle > file paths correctly in all cases (can this be done at all?)..
I have some old functions for that issue. > I'm using cygwin for that reason because it just works the way I'm > used to unless you want to parse compiler messages with C:\ in it.. > > If someone is interested in building up a "vim-framework" providing > some of the functions (background compilation, outline features, easy > script configuration setup, ..etc) let me know. I remember you had your framework online. Did you remove it? Otherwise, yes. I'm quite interested by the library/framework side of things ; even if there are a lot of redundant code between our two frameworks. :) Actually, I'm already maintaining a few more or less dependant frameworks. See http://code.google.com/p/lh-vim/wiki/lhVimLib for the more general one. [I'm currently adding boost.bind-like functions that I'm planning to use in order to simplify my refactoring plugin.] > I've already written an > alternative vim script distribution system figuring out dependencies > automatically so that autoloading can be exploited fully. That sounds interesting. Having to say "to use this plugin, you have to install the following 4 vimballs", as I'm currently doing, does not seem to be the right way. I'll have a look at your solution. [...] > Looking at my comments below you see one sentence a way to often > "never got any feedback".. Sometimes, I have some feedback. But that's quite rare. Unless our scripts are exceptionally visible, we won't get much. Library oriented script seem to me to be the worse kind: most of us prefer to reinvent the wheel instead of relying on external library-plugins. > So I'd like to improve that. Is there any way to make www.vim.org > accept comments from other users ? I did move my scripts to googlecode to track their evolutions, bugs and RfC. May be, I'll move them back to vim.org if it eventually offer what has been discussed in the other thread about vim.org and scripts hosting. -- Luc Hermitte http://lh-vim.googlecode.com/ http://hermitte.free.fr/vim/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
