Tom Link wrote: >> a#b#version0_1#foo() ? >> > > I was just wondering what would happen if you installed package A > consisting of > > foo.vim (version 2) > bar.vim > > and then installed package B containing the files > > foo.vim (version 1) > boo.vim > > Then I remember that questions older windows installers used to ask: > "Do you really want to overwrite shdkishd.dll with shdkishd.dll". > > The vimball approach would be to have three separate packages A, B, > and foo. If you wanted to update foo, you wouldn't have to touch > packages A and B. With your approach, you'd have to update the > installers for A and B. But maybe I got it all wrong and maybe there > is an obvious solution for that. And maybe such questions would become > obsolete anyway with the use of git. > Additionally, plugin authors may include a " GetLatestVimScripts: ... lines, one for each package their plugin needs. The next :GLVS will then go and acquire all of them (assuming they're out-of-date).
Regards, Chip Campbell --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
