Saluton bill :)

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:40:34 +0800, bill lam dixit:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > Also trimming unnecessary text, otherwise you just get bottom
> > posters; just as bad as "outlook style" top posters.
> 
> IMO top posting is better than bottom posting because it saves
> typing or mouse drag to reach the answer.

If you toppost:

- Don't quote. It doesn't make sense, since the reply is *before* the
  quoted text, and the conversation would be read unordered. In short:
  the quoted text won't be ever read.

- If you quote, you will be breaking the normal reading order (top to
  bottom) and if anyone wants to follow the conversation, he will have
  to read the bottom part before. If two topposters are having a
  conversation the mess would be incredible. Namely, the message would
  have to be read from botton to top. Very unnatural.

- You're not saving time. You're getting extra time for yourself by not
  quoting properly thanks to the extra time the readers will take to
  read your reply. That's not polite.

- ¿You save time by not scrolling down? Well, that's you, because I want
  to read the original message if I wasn't following the conversation
  from the start, so I have to scroll down *and* scroll up again.

- You will screwing non-top-posters if they want to reply to your
  topposted message, because they no longer can quote properly unless
  they do a lot of hard work edition (easier with Vim, but that's not
  the point).

- You will be supporting humongous quoted texts. If everybody topposts,
  they leave the ENTIRE replied message quoted below their answer. This
  means that the conversation is harder to follow.

If you want even more reasons to avoid topposting, Google about it. I
think that weren't for crappy email clients like Outlook, no topposting
would have happened ever. Crappy programs lead to crappy habits.

Raúl "DervishD" Núñez de Arenas Coronado
-- 
Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen!
We are waiting for 13 Feb 2009 23:31:30 +0000 ...

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to