Matt Wozniski 写道:
> Assuming this indent/alignment style is used, you could get code that
> looked like this:
Let's add something more, okay?
> int main() {
> .-------int returnval = 5; /* This is the value that I will return.
> .------- It's nonzero, which means failure. */
> .-------if (foobar)
> .-------.-------return 0; /* This is where I return it.*/
> .-------else
> .-------.-------return 1; /* This is where I return it.*/
> }
Now we change the tab size to 3:
> int main() {
> .--int returnval = 5; /* This is the value that I will return.
> .-- It's nonzero, which means failure. */
> .--if (foobar)
> .--.--return 0; /* This is where I return it.*/
> .--else
> .--.--return 1; /* This is where I return it.*/
> }
The comment will not get aligned after you changed the tab size. mixed
tab and spaces does not help.
There's *no* way to use a variant tab size and retain a reasonable
output. Fix the tab size to 8 or use only spaces is the ultimate
solution anyway.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
