On Dec 24, 10:43 pm, pansz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Matt Wozniski 写道:
>
> > Assuming this indent/alignment style is used, you could get code that
> > looked like this:
>
> Let's add something more, okay?
>
> > int main() {
> > .-------int returnval = 5; /* This is the value that I will return.
> > .------- It's nonzero, which means failure. */
> > .-------if (foobar)
>
> > .-------.-------return 0; /* This is where I return it.*/
> > .-------else
>
> > .-------.-------return 1; /* This is where I return it.*/
> > }
>
> Now we change the tab size to 3:
> > int main() {
> > .--int returnval = 5; /* This is the value that I will return.
> > .-- It's nonzero, which means failure. */
> > .--if (foobar)
> > .--.--return 0; /* This is where I return it.*/
> > .--else
> > .--.--return 1; /* This is where I return it.*/
> > }
>
> The comment will not get aligned after you changed the tab size. mixed
> tab and spaces does not help.
What do you mean? What is not aligned? The output appears perfectly
reasonable to me.
Brett S.
>
> There's *no* way to use a variant tab size and retain a reasonable
> output. Fix the tab size to 8 or use only spaces is the ultimate
> solution anyway.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
