On 09/02/09 02:01, pansz wrote: > Martin Kopta 写道: >> What the hell did you do?! Arghhhhh!! My scripts now does not work and >> I have to do some hacks like when the bad patch occured in 7.1 >> patches. Damn you who did this! >> > All patches should pass the vim test suite. So the "bad patch" passed it. > > If you has a test case which should fail the "bad patch", you're welcome > to contribute the test case to vim.
What the OP calls "the bad patch" is any cumulative patch, as 7.2.001-100.gz (which recapitulates 7.2.001 to 7.2.100) as opposed to 7.2.102 (which is a "single" patch). Apparently he has written a patching script which doesn't take the possible existence of cumulative patches into account. Best regards, Tony. -- Imagine that Cray computer decides to make a personal computer. It has a 150 MHz processor, 200 megabytes of RAM, 1500 megabytes of disk storage, a screen resolution of 4096 x 4096 pixels, relies entirely on voice recognition for input, fits in your shirt pocket and costs $300. What's the first question that the computer community asks? "Is it PC compatible?" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
