2009/2/12 pansz <[email protected]>: > > James Freer 写道: >> Thanks Matthew > > >> In fact i now only do an annual April update - i don't reckon 6 months >> is worth doing. From version history it seems that October versions >> tend to be the ones when they try out something new and refine it for >> April version. >> >> james > > You're not alone! I'd always think April versions of ubuntu are far > superior than any October versions.
That's comforting to know. I had come to that conclusion myself. As far as ubuntu goes i think it is very good, with excellent documentation which has helped me learn more about linux than any other distro. I do think their six month releases are rather ambitious and would rather see an annual one with full testing and development. The project runs at a loss i believe and as i want to see it successful i wonder how long they will be able to keep going. I did look at other distros for a while, Suse and Fedora but i didn't feel they were as good. APT package management seems a better system to me. If i was to change it would be to Arch or Mepis. james --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
