On 12/02/09 09:51, StarWing wrote:
> John Beckett wrote:
>> StarWing wrote:
>>> many syntax file has bug. espcially vim.vim. the user-command has bug:
>>> you can't use functions like s:func_name for custom complete function.
>>> it shows error.
>> Thanks for the information, however if you are confident you have found
>> a bug, please create a new message (subject might be "Problem with
>> vim.vim"). Post an example of text that demonstrates the problem, and
>> your fix. If you do that, the people interested in vim.vim might
>> investigate.
>
> this might be a big plan -- i want to re-code the vim.vim. you know,
> it has so many highlight bugs when you write a vim script... such as
> mistake :substitute highlight, mistake function-name in a paren(that
> is, e.g: call func(funcA(funcB())), funcA and funcB will not
> highlighted), sometimes sync-error (all text term to black sometimes),
> and so on... so i think it's necessary for recode it... after a dozen
> of script to written, i will do this job, for my highlight-practise...
You might have a hard time keeping it up. The current syntax/vim.vim is
(in part) auto-generated in order to ease the maintainer's job of
keeping up with changing keywords (options, ex-commands, etc.).
Well, if you think you can do it better than Dr. Chip, good luck to you!
Best regards,
Tony.
--
Nothing has been found better than stupidity to believe oneself intelligent.
-- Amélie Nothomb
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
