Teemu Likonen 写道: > On 2009-02-13 11:42 (+0100), Tony Mechelynck wrote: > > But if we are more practical, Lisp is more powerful and elegant for > interactive programmable environments. One reason are exactly the nested > parentheses and other is the Lisp's nature of having data and code > completely the same thing.
Lua has the design philosophy like lisp but with different syntax, i.e. Lua is a true function-programing language without the heavy nested parentheses. Since it is extremely easy to embed Lua into any program I think Lua is better than Lisp in such case. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
