I must add my voice to this also. I just got all of the abridged stuff. However, up front I also want to say that I did (after seeing all of the e-mail) go to Google and set my preferences to reading everything online rather than continue to get the e-mails. If you all get a ton of messages from me which are abridged - then there is probably something wrong with Google's set up. Because all I'm doing presently - is just reading the e-mails.
Tony Mechelynck wrote: > On 28/03/09 23:53, Christian Ebert wrote: > >> * vim_use group on Saturday, January 12, 2008 at 10:59:27 +0000 >> >>> vim_use >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/vim_use?hl=en >>> >> <snip> >> >> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "vim_use" group. >>> >> But I never subscribed to the ABRIDGED version! >> >> Sorry, but this is simply intrusive and makes this list even more >> unreadable. A real pity. Why must the *Vim* list have a web >> interface that basically begs for this kind of stuff to happen >> and invites/encourages according behaviour ... >> >> Yeah, I'm old fashioned, I'm into text, and I want to read, and >> not just click buttons. >> >> Rant over. I shut up now. >> >> c >> > > So you also got them. Lots of "abridged" mails from long-past dates. I > wonder what happened. > > The only list where I'm subscribed in "abridged" form is vim_mac, > because only rare threads on that list concern me, and that one is > well-behaved, sending me one summary a day and nothing more. In all the > other lists where I'm subscribed (vim_use, vim_dev and vim_multibyte), I > want to get the full posts into my POP3 mailbox. Well, let's hope that > all those outdated summaries won't stop the flow of "current" full mails. > > > Best regards, > Tony. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
