On 17/05/09 14:50, John Beckett wrote:
[...]
> I'm certain that someone who would send a 2.6M attachment to a
> mailing list won't read our guidelines in advance, so I don't
> think updating them is worthwhile (and I've tried to keep the
> guidelines reasonably short for clarity, so adding a "stating
> the obvious" paragraph about how you shouldn't post large
> attachments does not appeal). However:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/vim_use/web/vim-information
> currently includes:
> No attachments (except for patches, or a file that
> someone requested on the list).
>
> So the guidelines already cover the situation reasonably well.
>
> John
I'm in favour of allowing (small) screenshots displaying "problems" with
Vim, e.g. with highlighting and such, what do you think?
Best regards,
Tony.
--
Kin, n.:
An affliction of the blood
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
