I have the following mapping setup:
181 nmap <buffer> <Leader>k <Plug>AccurevKeep
182 nnoremap <buffer> <script> <Plug>AccurevKeep <SID>Keep
183 nnoremap <buffer> <silent> <SID>Keep :call <SID>Keep()<CR>
I noticed if I ran the following nunmap *twice* in a row, both
mappings at lines 181 and 182 become unmapped. E.g.
608 nunmap <buffer> <Plug>AccurevKeep
609 " test double unmap
610 nunmap <buffer> <Plug>AccurevKeep
I verified that 182 gets unmapped first as {lhs}, as expected. I was
surprised to see that 181 was even affected given that the nunmap
pattern matched the {rhs}.
According to the docs, nunmap "Remove[s] the mapping of {lhs} for the
modes where the map command applies.". This seems a bit ambiguous
and perhaps there is an order of precedence matching {lhs} first, then
{rhs}? Or should it only match {lhs}?
Thanks! - dave (accurev plugin author)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
