davidpthomas schrieb:
> I have the following mapping setup:
>
> 181 nmap <buffer> <Leader>k <Plug>AccurevKeep
> 182 nnoremap <buffer> <script> <Plug>AccurevKeep <SID>Keep
> 183 nnoremap <buffer> <silent> <SID>Keep :call <SID>Keep()<CR>
>
> I noticed if I ran the following nunmap *twice* in a row, both
> mappings at lines 181 and 182 become unmapped. E.g.
>
> 608 nunmap <buffer> <Plug>AccurevKeep
> 609 " test double unmap
> 610 nunmap <buffer> <Plug>AccurevKeep
>
> I verified that 182 gets unmapped first as {lhs}, as expected. I was
> surprised to see that 181 was even affected given that the nunmap
> pattern matched the {rhs}.
>
> According to the docs, nunmap "Remove[s] the mapping of {lhs} for the
> modes where the map command applies.". This seems a bit ambiguous
> and perhaps there is an order of precedence matching {lhs} first, then
> {rhs}? Or should it only match {lhs}?
>
> Thanks! - dave (accurev plugin author)
Some convenience for abbreviations also "works" for mappings:
:h :una
Unmapping only happens when the {rhs} matches exactly.
--
Andy
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
