Saluton dae3 :) dae3 <[email protected]> skribis: > On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:07:05 -0500, Tim Chase <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm not sure I follow your intent here -- I was the one to originally >> suggest putting ":wq!" on the back. It's certainly a vim command and >> means exactly what I wanted it to mean, i.e. ":wq!" is the "write the >> current file, overwriting if needed even if read-only or >> pre-existing, and quit", loosely to be interpreted as "vim...that's >> all I need to write, and I do so with confidence/authority". > > I was posting in jest, of course. However, you don't need an ! after > :wq except for the odd read-only file which you probably shouldn't > overwrite anyway. > > I prefer ZZ myself.
But you must admit that there are more people out there that would recognize ":wq!" that people that would recognize "ZZ" as something "vimmie" or at least geeky/freaky. So, ":wq!" adds to the geek value of the t-shirt. And yes, I would use the "!" ;)))) Now seriously, I think that ":wq!" (or without the "!") looks more "vimmie" than "ZZ". And yes, I use "ZZ" a lot whenever I don't want to reach "Shift+.", which is what is needed in my keyboard for ":" ;) -- Raúl "DervishD" Núñez de Arenas Coronado Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
