Linda W 写道: > The RFC started in plain text because that was all that was available. > But look at the *internet* documents from the Web consortium on CSS, or > documents on fonts or on color profiles -- none are in plain text. > The spec for adobe PDF isn't in plain text. > plain text main be fine for nuts and bolts --- low level tech info, but > if you are discussing anything above the level of protocols, you tend to > write in such. I was discussing the use of fonts and multi font > support. It's hard to make examples of multi font support in plain text.
So you don't quite get to the point. One question: do you post the mail in order to get problem solved or to launch a flame war? If what you want is to launch a flame war, then go on with top-posting and html posting. never mind, no more replies. If you want to describe your proposal, if you want to discuss something in order to solve the problem, then stick to the rule of vim list society: plain-text, bottom-post. I would like your idea, I would like font setting be improved, and I kindly remind you that post plain text will make more people read your mail and more chance to get your proposal understood. Please, continue argument that the html is better if you don't want to get back to your original topic. of if you really want to discuss your original topic, re-post in plain-text. BTW: most website of "big company" have no problem viewing with w3m (the text-mode www browser) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
