Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote: >Tricky. Unless you really HATE some option (or support) that came with >one of the "flavors" of VIM (tiny, small, big, huge), I strongly >recommend you to stick to one of these. Probably a "big" version will be >enough for you. In any case, ":help feature-list" and ":help install" >within a running Vim. > >I may have not mentioned it: STICK TO ONE OF THE BASICS "FLAVORS" of >Vim if you can live with it. It is much easier and you can rebuild when >you are an expert in enabling and disabling features (some of them >depend on others, so it is a bit tricky to get only what you want).
My problem was quite the opposite. I don't want to miss some cool option :D 2009/11/23 Frank Shute <[email protected]>: > Is there any particular reason you want to compile and not install a > package from one of the Ubuntu repositories? It's been a while since last time I compiled Vim, so I'm not really sure, but I was using some plugin that required a newer vim versione. Maybe it was netrw. > As you say, there are numerous patches which apt will fetch for you. > > Otherwise, you can probably fetch them all via ftp using a client that > supports wildcards e.g lftp Well, there are archives to download them easier, so that would not be a problem. The problem would be to patch them all. I shall write a script for that. I was just wondering if I had to download all of them. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
