Forward to list.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: synstack() in insert mode
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 05:59:18 +0100
From: Marcin Szamotulski <[email protected]>
To: Tony Mechelynck <[email protected]>
On 04:09 Tue 06 Jul , Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 06/07/10 02:13, Marcin Szamotulski wrote:
>
> Sorry for not being precise, this doesn't give an error, but g:synstack
> variable should be a list while if I do ':echo g:synstack' I get '0' not '[]'.
>
> In a script I'm getting error because I then process with g:synstack as
> a list.
>
> Best regards,
> Marcin
Well, I get the value [] in g:synstack.
Also, please remember that bottom-posting is preferred on this list, as
mentioned until two and a half hours ago at the very bottom of every post.
Best regards,
Tony.
--
In Columbia, Pennsylvania, it is against the law for a pilot to tickle
a female flying student under her chin with a feather duster in order
to get her attention.
In both gentoo distributed version of vim and fresh install (using svn)
I get an error while in empty line, in non empty line things works fine.
Best regards,
Marcin.
ps. sorry for top-posting, I will follow the rules /this is my first
post here/.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
