Benjamin Haskell wrote:
> > I'll make it so that synstack() works when on the character just after
> > the end of the line. It was already working for an empty line, thus
> > should also work when just after the last character.
>
> Would it make sense to have it work on any character past the end of the
> line? I don't use 'virtualedit', but it seems like it'd make sense to
> treat the situation similarly.
I don't think it makes sense. There are no characters there so there is
no syntax stack there.
--
ZOOT: I'm afraid our life must seem very dull and quiet compared to yours.
We are but eightscore young blondes, all between sixteen and
nineteen-and-a-half, cut off in this castle, with no one to protect us.
Oooh. It is a lonely life ... bathing ... dressing ... undressing ...
making exciting underwear....
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
