Ответ на сообщение «Re: Why Vimball archives are evil?», присланное в 14:59:19 25 сентября 2010, Суббота, отправитель Tom Link:
> Based on the description on vim.org and clause 3, I had the impression > that it solves the same problem as tplugin (which could be described > with 3 too). tplugin-loader doesn't rely on extra work on part of the > developer (1) though, which is why it probably isn't? But maybe I just > don't get it. Yes, third clause is ambigious. Removed it, thanks. Текст сообщения: > > 1 Sorry, but my vimpluginloader is a library for developers. > > 2 It does not fetch anything neither itself nor with vim-addon-manager, > > 3 but is able to source > > runtime dependencies when they are required (that is why it is > > pluginloader). > > Based on the description on vim.org and clause 3, I had the impression > that it solves the same problem as tplugin (which could be described > with 3 too). tplugin-loader doesn't rely on extra work on part of the > developer (1) though, which is why it probably isn't? But maybe I just > don't get it. > > Regards, > Tom
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
