Excerpts from ZyX's message of Sat Jan 01 13:36:24 +0100 2011: > because time was changed.
About 20 years ago you almost only wrote assembler. Today you use languages providing more abstractions for most use cases (?). That's why some inflation could be considered being a good thing. A lot new technologies / languages were invented. In the end the "ranking" is kind of indicator for popularity. And that changes over time (?) You're free to disagree. What I wrote here is very vague anyway. So if something like this was implemented we definitely want it to be a "view" on the collected data only. Your mail shows that we should discuss this in depth or keep it as is using an additional "details" page or such only which I suggested the first time? Maybe there is no way to get this right. Maybe it could be added as experimental feature for sorting search results. But in the end you try multiple packages anyway keeping what serves you best. There is an alternative as well: Now that we have (multiple) package managers installing vim scripts maybe its a better idea to ask for submitting the list of used packages once a year anonymously? (That would be even more convenient for users and you'd have the decay of "usage-karma" whenever you call for submission again. Marc Weber -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
