> > I'd say only one person should be responsible for maintaining the info > > on vim.org. But there should be a way to transfer that responsibility/ > > maintainership. > > So you're fine with what I proposed (only reply if I got this wrong)
You suggested to allow multiple people to upload new files. For simplicity, I'd rather vote for having only one "release manager" who manages the info on vim.org -- mostly because I'd assume that it requires fewer changes in the source code. But it probably doesn't matter. > For plugin versions? Bad idea. It was meant as a simplification. Another simple solution would be a yearly inflation. Regards, Tom -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
