On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Tim Chase <v...@tim.thechases.com> wrote:
> On 03/23/2011 10:05 AM, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: > >> On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Tim Chase wrote: >> >>> set >>> >>> foldexpr=(getline(v:lnum)[:19]==getline(v:lnum+1)[:19])?6:((getline(v:lnum)[:16]==getline(v:lnum+1)[:16])?'<6':((getline(v:lnum)[:13]==getline(v:lnum+1)[:13])?'<5':((getline(v:lnum)[:10]==getline(v:lnum+1)[:10])?'<4':((getline(v:lnum)[:7]==getline(v:lnum+1)[:7])?'<3':((getline(v:lnum)[:4]==getline(v:lnum+1)[:4])?'<2':'<1'))))) >>> >>> looks like it works for me. >>> >> >> Get thee to a function! >> > > Indeed -- my reply was an ugly one-off that is far better suited for a real > function that's data-driven (your "s:levels") like Benjamin's. > > So, "c b", use Benjamin's solution instead of mine :) > > -tim > > > Thanks all for the help! I noticed that now when I open source code in vim, it doesn't fold (obviously since the foldexpr is set as decribed above). Is there a way to write the .vimrc so that it will use TimeStampFold() when folding files with a .log extension and use default (I believe it was indent) folds for source code? Thanks again for all the help! -cb -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
