On Apr 7, 11:11 pm, Tim Gray <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 07, 2011 at 04:15 PM -0400, Eric Weir wrote: > > >Still, as I imagine many are, I'm a bit intimidated complexity of the > >commands and the steep learning curve. So, I'm wondering if there are any > >ordinary, nonprogrammer writers here who've gotten comfortable with Vim as a > >writer's editor -- or is that just ridiculous to think of?
<snip> I used to be a translator. In the final years of this 'career' I used Gvim as a sort of frontend to Microsoft Word and translation software. I found that combination of autocompletion, autocorrection, marks, sessions, the convenience of keyboard only editing, Vim's speed and reliability, and the ease with which complicated commands can be assigned to keystrokes helped me to become both a faster and a more accurate typist. The added bonus was that sometimes I had to make changes in exported translation memories (plain text files) and my Vim knowledge saved many an hour of line by line corrections. So I'd say: use Vim and learn a little every day. You can change litterally everything in Vim, including its looks and what happens if you type "\t". You could probably even make it behave like Wordstar. John -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
