On 08/22/2011 02:56 PM, ZyX wrote:
Reply to message «Re: Tweaking $ command»,
sent 22:26:44 22 August 2011, Monday
by AK:
It does move downward. 3$ moves 2 lines downward, etc.
Now see this in help. For some reason it was not working before while testing
(perhaps forgot to add more lines).
Ok, I see.. but why does map or function have to do anything with that,
they already get v:count and v:linenumber1 etc (IIRC), why isn't it up
to them to choose how to use or not use them?
You choose: by<C-u>. I don't like it either: it cost me much time trying to get
rid of this in<expr> mapping for visual mode.
I think it's also a particularly bad kludge because it's hard for a user
to know what to look for in help system.
I don't said it is *applied*. I said it is *reset* when normal-mode
command is executed. `normal' does execute the normal-mode command as
clearly stated by its name.
Either reset or applied, I don't see the logic in having that happen
with the first normal command in a function.
I don't rememeber it applied anywhere (though I don't like :normal! very much so
I can't say I tested this on all commands). On my setup it is simply ignored and
reset.
This won't work for {count}$, see above.
?? It does work for me in Vim 7.3. For both $ and {count}$ .
vim-7.3.266 (~amd64) USE="X acl bash-completion cscope gpm nls perl python ruby
vim-pager -debug -minimal", Gentoo
With the following script
vim -u NONE -N \
--cmd 'exe "fu_()\nnorm!$\nif v:count|exe\"norm\".v:count.\"h\"|en\nendf"'
\
--cmd 'nnoremap $ :<C-u>call _()<CR>' \
--cmd 'call setline(".", range(100000, 100500))'
Yes, it works fine for me in 7.3 with patches 1-35, 3$, 2$, etc. I
haven't seen the reason to update so far, is there a list of new stuff
in vim dev version? I don't know if I should update just to break my
function :-). -ak
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
