On Fri, 25 Nov 2011, Marc Weber wrote:

Excerpts from Bram Moolenaar's message of Thu Nov 24 21:42:27 +0100 2011:
I do think that a negative rating is useful.
It is - but not in the current shape.
If you give a negative rating its ok - but you should
- allow the author to remedy the issue
- force users dowvoting scripts to leave a message

If you want inaccurate ratings, sure, do that.

That's what you could do if you're assuming that the ratings are for the benefit of the plugin authors. I'd rather the ratings be useful for users.

Anything that makes leaving a rating take more effort will artificially inflate the ratings, which is bad for people trying to choose between two or more plugins that do the same thing. If someone who actually cares enough to go back and submit a rating isn't allowed to do so without leaving a comment, they'll likely not leave a rating. But, I don't see why not caring enough to help a plugin author fix the problem would invalidate the user's opinion.


Its ok to downvote for a reason such as "contains executable".
But its bad to have people provide negative rating and not knowing why!
The website should allow some minimal feedback.

Allow?  Yes, great idea.  Force?  No.


I have manually deleted the sequence of -1 ratings for script 2905.
Not a thing that we should need to do often.
You're right: In open source malicious downvoting does not happen often or should not. I've checked it: I can no longer access HTTP access logs.

Bram: do you still know when you changed the voting system using POST?

He wrote a message stating it was fixed on Sept. 2.


Then we can confirm what happened to Dr Charles Campbell's scripts.

Either it was what I explained (Google crawled a link that caused bad ratings when clicked) or it was malicious. Since it hasn't happened since the change to POST (to either Manpageview or your script), seems like evidence of the former.

--
Best,
Ben

--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

Reply via email to