On Thu, April 12, 2012 08:13, Boyko Bantchev wrote: >> That is not true. Since 7.3.116 digraph.txt contains all digraphs >> available. > > Nice to know that, but it seems a very recent addition.
If I recall correctly, it's more than a year ago, that I provided the patch: http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/msg/1eeb0d49255204d1 > I happen to be using several versions of Vim, the most recent being > 7.3.46, > and none of them has all the chars in digraph.txt. > So, perhaps we should say, `That *is* true, unless you compiled Vim > yourself from the most recent sources.' :) I wouldn't call that recent anymore ;) > In fact, even in its most recent version, digraph.txt is missing some > digraphs. > I just searched for the digraph /\ (for ×), and it is not in > http://code.google.com/p/vim/source/browse/runtime/doc/digraph.txt . Search for the hex code d7 and you'll find it. It seems like the Multiplication sign uses /\ and *X as digraph while only *X is documented. I don't know, how many more digraphs have several different chars to enter it (which are not documented). I found it by using my plugin that I already mentioned before. >> | ‘These default digraphs are taken from the RFC1345 mnemonics >> | [...] Exception: RFC1345 doesn't specify the euro sign.’ > > The Euro sign is not the only difference between rfc1345 and the > output of :digraphs. I cannot tell what all of them are, but, e.g., > the already mentioned /\ is known to Vim but is not in the rfc. > Perhaps, as well, Vim misses some definitions that the rfc has. Would be good to know, what else is missing, so one could add to the documentation. regards, Christian -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
