>> Your version of digraph.txt is not in the compiled versions of Vim >> distributed from vim.org. It is not even in the source packages for >> those who would compile Vim themselves. > > It is. I provided the patch and Bram committed it to the runtime files
No it isn't, effectively. It is nowhere in the exe or src packages on http://www.vim.org/download.php or http://www.vim.org/sources.php, which are what almost all users of Vim use. To all of them, including me, digraph.txt only lists a small portion of the available digraphs. We would not even suspect the existence of a newer version of anything (let alone use it) until it comes with an official package that can be run on our systems. > Which happens to produce the same glyph (it just uses a different set > of characters to create them). But that pair of characters, and not the glyph which it represents, is precisely what is called a 'digraph'. And saying 'it is there' when it actually isn't won't make it appear. -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
