2012/5/11 Marc Weber <[email protected]> > Activating a plugin does not cause much overhead , only a path to > &runtimepath is added unless the plugin also has plugin/*.vim files. > Yep I know, just thinking ahead if having a big runtimepath can make things slower.
> > So make me understand what's wrong with always activating the plugin? > Why is it that costly that you want to avoid it? > > Of course adding 'dependencies-to-be-installed-only' is no issue. > However I'd like to avoid complexity if possible. > I think if the "Activation on file Type" mechanism get more stable and finally is included in VAM out of the box, this feature, dependencies only for installation makes sense. > > We may end up creating a github issue before taking any actions so that > all people involed (eg ZyX) can think about it. > No p[roblem is you think is the bst way to report the issue. > > Marc Weber > > -- > You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > -- Un saludo Best Regards Pablo Giménez -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
