On Jul 14, 2013 5:21 PM, "Tim Chase" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2013-07-14 15:00, Nikolay Pavlov wrote: > > vim-use is not a proper place to ask such question. I forwarded your > > message to vim-dev. Please discuss nothing here. > > This is a pretty harsh rebuke for something quite apropos of this > list. It might have been a peculiar as-designed behavior, or it > might have been a bug. It's also good for other members on the list > to be aware of such peculiar behaviors that exhibit themselves in the > running application (rather than issues in the source code itself). > If anything, based on the list's history, it's far better (or at > least more common) to dialog on vim-use@ until it's a confirmed bug, > at which point the under-the-hood discussion moves to vim-dev@ > > I appreciate having the issue raised here initially.
Ok, I must apologize then. Just thought that a) there is no reason it should not be a bug and b) bugs should only go to vim-dev because Bram takes less attention to vim-use. > -tim > > -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
