I agree with this. It comes down to freedom of choice really. I see no
reason to continue Pathogen, it too depends on git and NeoBundle does
such a better job. The others have their own places though.
On 23/03/14 16:15, Michael Hernandez wrote:
On Mar 23, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net> wrote:
At some point Vim started supporting plugins. At that time it was fine
to add a plugin manually, it was a one-time thing. But now that there
are so many plugins and they get updated often, manually updating
plugins has become tedious.
I am wondering what Vim users like about plugin managers.
Is there one that works best, that everybody should use?
Are there still features that no existing plugin manager offers?
Vundle appears to be popular, someone mentioned it's better than
Pathogen. So nobody is using Pathogen?
But then there is also NeoBundle. But not everybody has git installed
and it depends on that.
And there also is vim-addon-manager. And Vimball.
Is it fine to have a choice of plugin managers, or is this causing a
headache (for users and/or for plugin writers). If yes, then we should
pick one plugin manager and retire the others.
I think it's fine to have a choice of manager. I was using Vundle because it
was so easy but I've switched to NeoBundle because it is simple like Vundle,
but can handle automation of post-install tasks such as compiling a auxiliary
component for you.
--Mike H
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
