> Is it fine to have a choice of plugin managers, or is this causing a > headache (for users and/or for plugin writers). If yes, then we should > pick one plugin manager and retire the others.
I'm glad you picked this topic up. I personally use simple shell scripts to keep the git repos up to date. I don't think having the plugin manager built-in is a necessity although it would make things easier for newcomers, I guess. IMHO almost any choice is better than the current situation. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
