On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 04:09:01PM -0700, Linda A. Walsh wrote: > 2) is to not make changes to a user's file unless they > ask them to be made (i.e. 'eol' would be "true" by > default -- don't modify end-of-file). With the > option to modify EOF by adding an 'eol' being > the optional behavior?
I am opposed to this change because Vim is primarily a _text_ editor, and its defaults should reflect as much. Certain text editors (*cough*sublime*cough*) default to not adding an EOL at the end of files. If honoring the EOL were the default behavior, then I would have to manually verify (or be prompted every time) whether or not every text file I edit has a proper EOL at the end of the file. I edit files-from-users-whose-editors-don't-add-EOL far more often that I edit binary files with Vim, and I imagine that's the situation for most Vim users. Eric -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
