On Thursday, October 15, 2015 at 11:15:45 PM UTC-4, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Paul <paul.domaskisATgmail.com> wrote: > > Actually, the reason you might have cringed at syntax highlighting, > > especially if you just looked at it momentarily, is default colours. > > We all have our unique preferences, and my color scheme looks nothing > > like the (nowadays) default. But if you haven't missed the feature > > til now, more power to you. > > We each have our preferences, and that's why (1) Vim comes with a lot > of different color schemes, and (2) with a little digging into the > help, it isn't very hard to write your own. > > My homebuilt colorscheme > http://users.skynet.be/antoine.mechelynck/other/almost-default.vim > looks "almost but not exactly" like the gvim default, both in gvim and > in a 256-color terminal such as konsole or xterm, provided that some > "helper script" such as CSApprox is loaded. (In the 8/16 color text > console it falls back to "almost" the console Vim default.) One of the > "funnies" I have built into it is a status line which changes colour > at the CursorHold,CursorHoldI events. > > Best regards, > Tony.
OK. I was just guessing at why syntax highlightng would induce a cringe. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
