On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 9:20:00 AM UTC-5, Matthew Desjardins wrote: > There have been a couple of people posting about how the new package feature > can, in its current state, replace Pathogen. > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/vim_dev/BN5DuHpzzBc/OjoGDSqeEQAJ > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/vim_use/QHqDKtdqUkk/PY7WydFdAQAJ > > Could someone explain how? It doesn't seem to work for plugins that don't > have a "plugin" directory, and as far as I can tell from the source it's not > supposed to, either. > > Why was this decision made to only support plugins with a "plugin" directory?
If I'm understanding 7.4.1480 correctly, if something is just a syntax file, for example, it has to go under "opts" and loaded manually with ":packadd"? -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
