On Saturday, 24 September 2016 11:40:01 UTC+2, [email protected]  wrote:
> I am a novice in gVim. I often need the help function. <shift>:h<space>. I 
> understand I can map this combination of 4 keystrokes to a single key. 
> Is ; a good choice?
> 
> The website  <http://vimcasts.org/blog/2013/02/habit-breaking-habit-making/ 
> attracted my attention, thanks to a recent post in this maillist. I 
> understand ; is useful to repeat a character search with t,T,f,F for my 
> period as novice.
> 
> I think the best decision is to use ; for the time being, but according to 
> the article j and k are also could alternatives. What about h and l? 
> 
> Has someone an advice for me?
> 
> Alle

Thank for your advises. To resume: the function keys F2 till F12 (on my 
keyboard) are available as 'shortcuts'. It is not advisable to use keys which 
have already a function in the normal mode of Vim, because then I will loose 
possible functionality. Perhaps uppercase Q. 

For my special question I can change the function of <F1>, because I want to 
visit the helpfile over particular subjects, mostly, and not open it generally.

When the time is there for more than 11 'shortcuts', I can think about which 
functionality I will offer for my 'shortcuts'. I understand there are many 
strategies to move the cursor. I will develop my own strategy and will pick 
keys dedicated to the alternative strategies. They will be not useful for me. 

In the meantime, I will follow discussions over motion strategies in this 
mailinglist. 

Again, thanks for the reactions on my novice-question.

Alle 

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to