any update regarding this issue ?
2016-10-09 23:25 GMT+02:00 Osman Koçak <kocak...@gmail.com>:
> Hmmm, I see...
> However, I think it should be possible to fix it since the forward search
> ('/') don't mess up in such cases.
> I also have a "workaround" (in Vimscript) that **seems** to work (I wrote
> and tested it quite quickly, so I'm not sure):
> function! Select_match() abort
> if &selection == 'exclusive' && stridx(&virtualedit, 'onemore') == -1
> return ''
> let [l1, c1] = getpos('''<')[1:2]
> let [l2, c2] = getpos('''>')[1:2]
> let pos = getpos('.')
> let l = pos + (l2 - l1)
> let c = pos + (c2 - c1)
> if l1 != l2
> let c += strwidth(getline(l1)) - strwidth(getline(pos))
> execute 'normal ' . l . 'G' . c . '|v' . pos . 'G' . pos . '|'
> This function should behave as the 'gN' command...
> 2016-10-09 18:01 GMT+02:00 Christian Brabandt <cbli...@256bit.org>:
>> On So, 09 Okt 2016, Osman Koçak wrote:
>> > OK, can you please let me know when the patch eventually gets into Vim.
>> > Thanks again!
>> Hm, that is a tricky one and I am not sure how to solve that one.
>> If you take this text (here with line numbers:)
>> 1 test test test test
>> 2 test test test test
>> 3 test test test test
>> 4 test
>> 5 test test test
>> The basic logic for the gN motion is, (1st) move to the next match and
>> from there (2nd) move to the end of the previous match, then (3rd) mark
>> everything until the beginning of the now current match.
>> However the search pattern "test\ntest" adds some uncertainty, where the
>> next and previous match starts. Consider your cursor on the first
>> character of the word test in line 3. The motion gN will first move it
>> to the next match, which is at the beginning of the next line (line 4),
>> however, at the same time, it is still part of the current match.
>> Therefore, jumping back to the previous match will move the cursor to
>> line 2 end of the first word test.
>> To fix that, we would need to make sure, that at step one, we have to
>> move over everything which is part of the current match and I really
>> don't know if this is possible.
>> I am uncertain whether this is a bug or should be documented, that gN
>> might not work well for overlapping multiline patterns.
>> You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
>> Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
>> For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "vim_use" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.