Hi, Often it i said, vim would have a steep learning curve...
If I think aboyt a "steep learning curve" as such in a more mathematical sense...I dont understand this argument for being a negative one. Suppose this "steep learning curve" would be a graph in the mathematical sense -- I would think, that the X-axis represents t (time) and the Y-axis represents the amount of knowledge k in turn. With this setuo a steep curve would imply, that mu knowledge about for example vim would increase more in a shorter period of time than with other tools with a flat learning curve which does not reaches that high values for Y....notepad for example. Why is this taken as a negative feature? Let us build more tools with steep learninging curves to seperate those from tools which has nothing to offer... ;) This is not meant as an argument for overcomplicated tools, though... Or did I understand totally wrong here...? Cheers Meino PS: I dont understand "editor wars" -- how can be there a war between a sole editor? ;) -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.