On 2020-11-01, Dominique Pellé wrote: > Dominique Pellé wrote: > > > Tekki wrote: > > > > > Chris Jones schrieb am Samstag, 31. Oktober 2020 um 20:16:53 UTC+1: > > >> > > >> > > >> So what's the next step? > > >> > > > > > > You could create your own sort command in vimrc, for example > > > > > > command -nargs=1 Sort :.,+<args>!sort - > > > > > > Then :Sort7 will sort the above list of letters correctly. > > > > Indeed, you could use %!sort to use the Unix sort command > > instead of the Vim ex command (possibly replace % with > > another range if you don't want to sort the entire file). > > > > That said, sorting using the locale ordering with Ex :sort > > could be useful. I see that ex_sort() in ex_cmds.c calls > > sort_compare() and that function calls STRCMP() or > > STRICMP(). strcmp() not use the locale, but strcoll() does. > > We could consider adding a sorting option to honor the current > > locale (e.g. :sort l) which would compare using strcoll() instead > > of STRCMP or STRICMP. > > I just created a git pull request to implement sorting using the > current locale. It adds a l option to the :sort Ex command. > > See: > > https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/7237
Is this consistent with Christian's fix for #6229 in June? I haven't looked at either patch closely--I just remembered that this issue had been discussed before--but they seem to take different approaches to setting the collation order. I don't particularly care how it's done, but I do care that it's done consistently. Regards, Gary -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/20201102013130.GA10555%40phoenix.
