First order of business is to check the condition of
the balljoints & tierod ends... make sure the wheel
bearings aren't sloppy and that the tires and rims
match (set the pressures too). A bent beam or one with
worn control arm bushings would also present a
problem. Assuming all is well, check the camber and
adjust it if needed. You'll need the car parked on a
LEVEL surface to do this....it's also assumed that the
REAR suspension has no problems that might be inducing
a tilt to the front of the car - measure the distance
from ground to rear torsion housing and from ground to
bottom of the front beam on both sides. Camber should
be 30' (½°) positive - top of tire further out than
bottom - plus or minus 20' (1/3°) and the maximum
deviation betwen one side and the other should be kept
below 30'. This is the hardest thing to do under the
shadetree, you can use a $10 magnetic protractor (but
it's hard to see anything smaller than ~½° with one of
those) or a carpenter's square and bubble-level with
some trigonometric calculations. Note that the notch
in the camber eccentric should always be pointed
forward plus or minus 90° - if you point it aft the
caster will bew outside of design margins.

Once the camber is in spec you can set the toe-in.
Spec is 30' ± 20', or you can measure with a
tape...distance between the front of the tires should
be 1/16" to 7/32" less than the distance between them
at the rear. This is a little tricky to do because you
can't take a direct reading halfway up the tire (the
body/pan get in the way, and the reading must be made
with the car on the ground) but if you go for ~1/16"
as high up as you CAN measure it should be good. To
eliminate any error caused by tire/rim runout, first
jack up the front an spin each wheel while scribing a
mark down the center of the tread with chalk, pencil,
or a Sharpie and take your measurements off of that
line.
Caster isn't adjustable (other than as a side-effect
of setting the camber) without shimming the beam
(typically at the bottom) away from the frame
head...but the spec, in case you decide to let
Canadian Tire have another go at it, is 3°20' ± 1°.
This equates to a difference in CAMBER between the
reading with wheels turned 20° left versus 20° right
of 2°15' ±40'.

You also need to assure that the steering box is at
its true center when the wheels are pointed straight
ahead. Since God only knows how many times the
steering wheel may have been off & on the column in
the last 37 years (and with no "master" spline, it
could easily have been reinstalled a spline or two
off) the pragmatic approach to this is to turn the
wheels to full lock in either direction, checking that
neither tire is contacting the beam/lower control arm
before the Pitman arm hits its stops. Count the
steering wheel turns from lock-to-lock (approximately
2-3/4) and put the wheel at exactly the halfway point
- hopefully it'll be straight. If it is, when you
adjust the the toe-in you should make equal changes in
opposite directions on each tierod. If not, you may
need to adjust one side more than the other. This
assumes that nobody has changed the steering box or
adjusted the stops since the car left the factory, in
which case the stops need to be backed off until
they'e ineffective so you can find the true steering
box center and start over. Also, of course, that the
beam, control arms. spindles & tierods are dead-true
(never taken a shot that might've bent any of them a
little) and that the ball joints and tierod ends have
no excess slop in them. 
Sound daunting? The good news is that you can probably
do just as good a job at home as you can expect from
any chain-store with a rack trying to get the job done
in the allotted time, and Standard Beetles aren't
really that particular anyway (if you're even close,
the worst that'll happen is the tires may wear
slightly faster) ...so you may as well go for it! 
 

--- Courtney Hook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I was just told that Canadian Tire couldn't do the
> alignment on my 70 bug because they didn't have the
> specs. I can't imagine an easier vehicle to do one
> on, so thought, what the heck, I'll do it myself. I
> seem to recall you could do one yourself with a tape
> measure. Has anyone done one lately and remembers
> the procedure? I posted it to the type 2 list as
> well, because the front ends are the same design.
> Thanks,
> Courtney


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

_______________________________________________
vintagvw site list
[email protected]
http://lists.sjsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/vintagvw

Reply via email to