On 03/09/2013 02:02 AM, Chris Evich wrote:
On 02/27/2013 10:20 PM, Alex Jia wrote:
+ variants:
+ ...
+ options =
Any objection if I rename this to 'numatune_options'?
It's a little redundant, we can know this option belongs numatune
testing from previous
naming, for example:
(6/52)
*virsh_numatune*.positive_testing.*get_numa_parameter*.shutoff_guest.*options*.current:
PASS (0.59 s)
(7/52)
*virsh_numatune*.positive_testing.*set_numa_parameter*.shutoff_guest.change_mode.*options*.config.preferred:
PASS (0.68 s)
Although I know you want to avoid naming conflict, the following naming
is indeed redundant:
(6/52)
*virsh_numatune*.positive_testing.*get_numa_parameter*.shutoff_guest.*numatune_options*.current:
PASS (0.59 s)
(7/52)
*virsh_numatune*.positive_testing.*set_numa_parameter*.shutoff_guest.change_mode.*numatune_options*.config.preferred:
PASS (0.68 s)
_______________________________________________
Virt-test-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel
