On 11/13/2013 01:11 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > TL/DR; So in a nut-shell, from an ordinary dev's perspective (not release management or maintainer) it's kind of like we're just renaming "next" to "master", correct?
Documentation-wise then, where would we suggest somebody's initial experience come from, master or latest release? In general I think this is a good idea, however I'd caution against perceiving any urgency with this change. I think it would be healthier to set some future date, advertise it far and wide, maybe include a PR-freeze also, along with "countdown" announcements along the way. Essentially try to limit the "surprise" factor for people who may not keep up with ML or hangouts more than once or twice every few weeks. For some, the project is important, but keeping up with news may be fairly low on their list. Just a suggestion. -- Chris Evich, RHCA, RHCE, RHCDS, RHCSS Quality Assurance Engineer e-mail: cevich + `@' + redhat.com o: 1-888-RED-HAT1 x44214 _______________________________________________ Virt-test-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel
