On 11/14/2013 11:43 AM, Chris Evich wrote:
On 11/13/2013 01:11 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
TL/DR;
So in a nut-shell, from an ordinary dev's perspective (not release
management or maintainer) it's kind of like we're just renaming "next"
to "master", correct?
Yep. One less branch, and makes the project more in line with other
prominent projects that use git.
Documentation-wise then, where would we suggest somebody's initial
experience come from, master or latest release?
In general I think this is a good idea, however I'd caution against
perceiving any urgency with this change. I think it would be healthier
to set some future date, advertise it far and wide, maybe include a
PR-freeze also, along with "countdown" announcements along the way.
Essentially try to limit the "surprise" factor for people who may not
keep up with ML or hangouts more than once or twice every few weeks.
For some, the project is important, but keeping up with news may be
fairly low on their list. Just a suggestion.
Fair enough, agreed.
_______________________________________________
Virt-test-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel
