On 05/28/2014 12:00 AM, John Ferlan wrote: ...
- 10 virsh.volume_application (PR#60)
Okey, Liyang will take this issue.
- 2 virsh.vol_resize (known failure, bz#1077068) - 3 virsh.undefine (PR#141)
Okey, Liyang will take look at it.
- 1 virsh.snapshot_create_as (known guest agent issue - investigating)
Thanx
- 9 virsh.schedinfo_qemu_posix (known failure with PR#145)
As we are not sure how to treat the trouble in --config, do you want me revert the commit for the --config test now??
- 1 virsh.domblkerror (PR#48)
Yu, it seems you merge this test. From the comment you post in PR#48, you did run it and it worked well. Please take a look at this error.
>From the failures listed above a number of other tests also failed because of "entrails" left behind on the failure. The entrails are xml changes which caused future tests to fail because of the presence of something unexpected. For this run - a failure in the 3rd undefine FAIL to restore the xml caused failures in 'snapshot_edit' and 'snapshot_create_as' since a snapshot was left in the guest xml. The failure in 'domblkerror' to create a backup xml and restore it caused all the 'dommemstat' and 'blockcopy' tests run afterwards to fail because there was no backup xml and a volume added to the domain was no longer present. Fortunately for me 'domblkerror' was one of the last tests to run; otherwise, there would have been more failures. Running those tests separately after the full run was done had expected results. John _______________________________________________ Virt-test-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel .
_______________________________________________ Virt-test-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel
